A daylong meeting results in a decisive vote: 20 for, none against.

Enlarge/ This unassuming building in Massachusetts has taken on remarkable significance in recent weeks.
48 with 34 posters participating
View more stories
Earlier this week, the FDA released documents that summarized the data on a second SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate, this one from a company called Moderna. That document was the background for a meeting of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, which would consider whether the benefits of the vaccine outweigh its potential risks. That question is one of the key considerations for the agency as it decides whether to grant an emergency use authorization similar to the one it gave the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.
After an all-day meeting that frequently focused on other topics, the committee was near unanimous: 20 votes for approval, none against, and one abstention.
Emergency use authorizations have a number of requirements once a health emergency has been declared. There must be no alternatives that have achieved full FDA approval, there must be reasons to think that the treatment will be effective, and its benefits are considered likely to outweigh its risks. It’s that final questionthe risk versus benefit balancethat the advisory committee was called to address.
To make that determination, the committee heard testimony from people involved in the clinical trial and other experts who evaluated the data. It also took public comment on the question. But the data was so promising that the committee spent most of its time debating what should happen to the trial participants once an emergency use authorization was granted. Those who received the placebo are expected to be immunized, but how that’s handled was a matter of extensive discussion.
Issues raised included the question of whether both vaccine and placebo groups should receive new injections in order to keep the study blinded and whether the placebo recipients should be given the vaccine as if they were prioritized along with the general population. Maintaining the trial long enough to get data from long-term safety monitoring may depend on how these issues are handled, but they’re secondary to the emergency use authorization.
Lets do this!
When the vote finally came for that, it was decisive: 20 committee members voted that the benefits are likely to outweigh the risks, and a single person abstained. There were zero votes against the proposition.
The FDA still has to consider the other requirements for an emergency use authorization, but they’re unlikely to be major hurdles. While another vaccine has been approved for emergency use, nothing is at all close to having full FDA approval. And the same data that shows clear benefits would seem to handle the issue of there being reason to think the vaccine will be effective. In the case of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, the FDA acted within 48 hours of the Advisory Committee’s thumbs-up, so we may have news before this weekend.